- Designer freighters with no pilots may become a reality, says Boeing strategy chief July 19, 2018
- Cargo must be ‘at the forefront’ of Britain’s post-Brexit aviation policy July 19, 2018
- 2M Alliance in Asia-US east coast transpacific services tie-up with Zim July 19, 2018
- K+N ‘en route for success in 2018’, with first-half revenue and profits up July 19, 2018
- US retailers rush to fill shelves before trade war tariffs start to bite July 19, 2018
- New York launches $100m barge and rail freight programme July 19, 2018
- Volga-Dnepr unveils major plans for new regional air cargo hub at Liege July 18, 2018
- ‘Drones are the ‘ideal solution’ to getting cargo to Africa’s remote areas’ July 18, 2018
- Most IoT Projects Failing, Deloitte Says, but Technology Help is On the Way July 18, 2018
- Supply Chain News on New US Tariffs will Hit Many US Manufacturers Hard because of Focus on Intermediate Goods July 18, 2018
- Supply Chain Newsmakers Video Series on John Santagate of IDC on Mobile Robots in Distribution July 17, 2018
- Ports of the Future in a New Ecosystem July 5, 2018
- Securing Future Ports with Multi-Level Cyber Security October 9, 2017
- Are TOS Systems Efficient Enough for SMTs? March 22, 2017
- #SNAME125 July 19, 2018
- Navico Hires Elgie to Lead Americas Sales July 19, 2018
- Wisconsin Shipyards Awarded Nearly $2 Mln in Grants July 19, 2018
Tag Archives: Software
Naturally CIOs are an entrenched bunch. But the lack of use cases that actually work is definitely a barrier to experimentation, along with the inflated cost and risk of finding software engineers with the expertise.
Here’s a great idea: why don’t we simply buy a 3PL? It is a lot easier than developing all that wretched software ourselves! Seriously, why isn’t consolidation of 3PLs and maritime firms a good way to extend services beyond the port and put them under the control of someone we can trust to (more or less) handle the movements the way we want? It is a time-honored way to gain capabilities we do not have without doing the work of creating a new business. Sure there can be some coordination issues, but are they as bad as Maersk has coordinating with IBM on their blockchain system?
Remember that providing coordination and visibility of information is mostly what blockchain accomplishes, and the jury is out on whether it can be made competitive with existing types of databases (which may also need improvement, to be sure). And any of these systems is “permissioned” in blockchain lingo– there is a governor who is empowered to make decisions about who is allowed to use it. None of them is truly decentralized for governance, as the Bitcoin advocates would have you believe; in that world, the miners (of whom there are now about 6 with a 75% share of all blocks mined) can exercise control whenever they want.
It comes down to trust. Who do we trust? Central banks, or a bunch of miners? Or are we happy enough trusting Maersk, or CMA-CGM and Ceva, or some other 3PL with our cargo, and prefer to argue with them over damaged or misplaced cargoes, rather than debate with some Ethereum sites about these issues?
I’m not sure how it will come out, but I don’t think it will be all one way or the other.By Alessandro Pasetti
See also: CMA CGM will buy 25% stake in CEVA logistics, By Shefali Kapadia , April 20, 018
Get a job in high tech!!!
Robert Half Hi Tech Salary Study 2018: